Noah R. Eber-Schmid

A picture of Noah Eber-Schmid

Faculty Fellow in Political Science | 815 PLC


Academic Areas: Democratic Theory, Anglo-American Political Thought, Contemporary Political Theory, Extremism, Citizenship, History of Political Thought

Academic Background:

  • Ph.D., Rutgers University (2016)
  • M.A., New York University (2009)
  • B.A., Union College (2006)

    Statement: Professor Eber-Schmid is a political theorist specializing in the history of Anglo-American political thought and contemporary democratic theory. His work applies contemporary democratic and critical theory to issues of political extremism, citizenship, and popular democracy in American political history and today. Before joining the University of Oregon, Professor Eber-Schmid taught at Bucknell University and Rutgers University.

    Professor Eber-Schmid’s current research addresses the important but under-examined question of how extremism, fanaticism, and zealotry shaped popular democratic politics (i.e., practices that aim to deepen and expand political equality) in the American Founding era. Through studies of the early memorialization of the Boston Massacre, popular debates over Shays’s Rebellion, the thought and practices of the Democratic Societies, and the use of the French Revolution in American political debate, his work challenges conventional interpretive approaches to the history of the American democratic tradition and draws out new implications for theoretical approaches to contemporary American democracy. Since the American Revolution, democratic theorists have often presupposed that dispassionate rationality, reciprocity, and nonviolent tolerance are necessary conditions for the sustained development of democracy. Intractable oppositional parties that reject frameworks of consensus, terms of mutual respect, and use force to accomplish their political goals are often excluded as irrational antidemocratic extremists outside the bounds of legitimate political contest. Professor Eber-Schmid’s work problematizes this exclusion, offering new insights into the divisive and violent nature of democratic politics in the American polity.